“Smart Power Setback” by David Brooks (TIMES, 6/21/11)


 I suppose we should be grateful that David Brooks is reporting on the failure of the U.S. effort to promote development in Afghanistan.

However, when he claims that violence “doesn’t stem from poverty” but from “grudges, tribal dynamics and religious fanaticism,” he minimizes the Afghani opposition to a foreign presence.

“Smart power” is not viewed as beneficial to Afghanistan because it emanates from an occupying army. No matter how well-intentioned such “aid” might be in the hands of some genuine reformers, it is viewed as the work of imperialism.

Moreover, the U.S. economy cannot support it, certainly not for generations. Whether he likes it or not, Brooks has made an argument for the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: